(443) 850-4426
Currently Browsing: Trucking Accidents

Ray LaHood’s Blueprint to End Distracted Driving

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood’s crusade against distracted driving is getting a lot of federal money behind it.  $2.4 million is being used for a pilot program in Delaware and California called Phone in One Hand, Ticket in the Other.  Here is more of what Mr. LaHood is planning: 

  • Promote distracted driving laws in the 11 states without such rules
  • Encourage auto industry to develop and fine tune technology to help prevent distracted driving
  • Work on driver education course material to educate younger drivers

You can find the official Blueprint here.  


Monday Morning News Round-Up

Here are the top stories we’ve been following:

  • Best Time to Post Blog Entry is 11AM Monday Morning:  the title is a bit deceptive–really, the average blog gets the most traffic around 11:00 a.m., meaning that it needs to be posted before 11.  Heck, it could have been posted hours before.  But, this might have some meaning for other social media that reports the posting–for example, if you are trying to attract people to your blog post by putting up a link to it on your Facebook page (courtesy Larry Bodine LawMarketing Blog)

Happy Monday!

~~John Cord


More Blogs from John Cord Law

Thank you for reading our blog.  If you find it interesting, give our other blogs a chance. We also publish the Maryland Car Accident Lawyer Blog.  Here are the stories for the past week:

  • More On School Bus Accidents (exploring issues in school bus collisions, including seatbelts, driver inexperience, driver distraction, and roadway design defects)
  • Why You Need Better Car Insurance (did you know that the worst of the worst drivers can still get insurance through MAIF?  It doesn’t matter how many DUIs or accidents they’ve been involved in, they can still get insurance.  And guaranteed, they are only getting the minimum (these are not responsible people!)).
  • Bus And Taxi Accidents In Maryland (learn about the higher duty of care owed by bus drivers to their passengers–even before the passengers are fully on the bus).

And, don’t forget that we write a post every other Monday for Maryland’s legal newspaper, The Daily Record.  Find our posts (including a new one this upcoming Monday) at Generation J.D., a blog intended to provide advice for younger lawyers.

Blogging for Lawyers


Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Waivers

Personal Injury Protection (PIP) is a key element to both physical and financial recovery after a Maryland automobile collision.  You PIP will pay for many things, mostly lost wages and medical bills, following an accident.  Importantly, your PIP will pay regardless of fault–even if you caused the collision, or if it was a single-car accident (and your insurance company will not raise your rates for using it).  Most people have the default $2,500.00 in PIP, though you can get up to $10,000 in no fault medical coverage from most Maryland insurance companies.

Let me explain why PIP is important.  A family of three (mom, dad and and a child) came to us for injuries from a car accident.  Mom and dad each had about $2,000 in medical bills, and the child had $5,000 in bills (she needed an MRI).  No lost wages.  After some workup, the settlement offers are $3,000 each for mom and dad, and $8,000 for the minor.  These are terrible offers (remember–every case is unique.  We’re going to have to file a lawsuit), but they are made even more terrible because the parents waived PIP.  That is, they told their insurance company that they didn’t want the protection of PIP.

There are many technical requirements to waive PIP. Essentially, it has to be a signed waiver, with specific text in a specific font and type. PIP waivers are valid for every successive policy renewal unless the insured rescinds the waiver in writing. The insurance companies typically don’t ask whether you want it every policy period once you waived–they just assume you don’t want it. But there are good reasons to change your mind.  Maybe you get a higher paying job. Maybe you become less risk-averse. Maybe you listened to the advice of your friendly Baltimore neighborhood lawyer (that’s me!).

Let’s assume the family wanted to accept the settlement offers.  We’ll also pretend a parallel universe where they did not waive PIP:

MOM/DAD

Without PIP

  • $2,000 medical bills
  • $3,000 settlement offer
  • $0.00 PIP
  • Attorneys’ fees (one-third):  $1,000
  • Client Take Home:  $0.00 (all medical bills paid)

With PIP

  • $2,000 medical bills
  • $3,000 settlement offer
  • $2,500 PIP
  • Attorneys’ fees (one-third):  $1,000
  • Client Take Home:  $2,000 (all medical bills paid)

CHILD

Without PIP

  • $5,000 medical bills
  • $8,000 settlement offer
  • $0.00 PIP
  • Attorneys’ fees (one-third):  $2,666.66
  • Client Take Home:  $333.34 (all medical bills paid)

With PIP

  • $5,000 medical bills
  • $8,000 settlement offer
  • $2,500 PIP
  • Attorneys’ fees (one-third):  $2,666.66
  • Client Take Home:  $2,833.34 (all medical bills paid)

You can see that PIP makes a big difference.  Without PIP, the accident victims get nothing or next-to-nothing. With a small amount of PIP, the medical bills get paid and the family can be compensated somewhat for what they went through–pain, discomfort, inconvenience of having to drive to appointments, etc….  We try not to think about the existence of PIP in determining whether we recommend a settlement–the value of a case does not depend on PIP, and jurors/judges don’t know whether a plaintiff has it or not. But, in extreme cases, it may make a lower offer more palatable for some clients.  In any event, higher PIP limits will increase a client’s take-home recovery.

One sidenote on waivers–a PIP waiver is not valid for minors under 16, who get the benefit of the default $2,500 when their parents waived PIP.  In the case described, the father signed the PIP waiver when the child was 14.  The accident happened when the child was 16, so she was not entitled to any PIP.

PIP only adds a small amount to your premium.  For your safety, don’t waive it.  For your safety, increase it to the maximum if you can.

  • If you’re interested, the Maryland laws on PIP are found in MD. CODE ANN., INSURANCE §§ 19-501, 19-505, 19-506, 19-507, 19-508 and 19-513. Importantly, these provisions are interpreted in appellate court decisions.

 


Surveillance in Personal Injury Cases

By filing a Maryland lawsuit for personal injuries, whether for an automobile accident, trucking accident, or on-the-job injury, the plaintiff places his physical condition (and often his mental condition) at issue. No matter how complicated the case is, and no matter what the specific injuries are, the defenses are usually the same:

  1. The plaintiff is not really hurt as badly as he is claiming; and
  2. The plaintiff’s injuries were not caused by this accident.
We’re going to deal with the first one.  The argument that the plaintiff isn’t really hurt that badly preys on public perception that people who file claims are in it for the money, are trying to win the “lawsuit lottery,” and are simply faking or exaggerating their injuries.  Realistically, some level of exaggeration probably happens sometimes.  I think faking it completely is less frequent–most of the doctors I know can spot fakers, and they don’t seem to make it very far through the process.
Defense attorneys and claims adjusters have in their arsenal multiple surveillance techniques to try to show to the fact-finder (judge, jury, workers’ compensation commissioner, etc…) that the claimant is not being entirely truthful about his injuries.  They hire private investigators to follow the claimant around, to take pictures, and to take video.  Then, after the claimant’s deposition where he says that he cannot garden, or lift heavy groceries, or whatever, they try to get that “gotcha” moment where they show the fact-finder pictures of the claimant doing just that.
In our experience, our clients are simply doing their best to live their lives as normally as possible.  Sometimes there is no other choice–no one else to do the grocery shopping.  Sometimes you have to pick up the children.  The video never shows what happens in the hours after, when people are sometimes debilitated by pain caused by doing things that they shouldn’t do.
Everyone should know that they may be recorded at any time–particularly in today’s society, where most people have video cameras on their cell phones.  It is so easy to record that there are reports of teachers losing their jobs when they react to students who are deliberately provoking and recording the teachers (called cyberbaiting).  There are a few things to combat these arguments:
  1. Claimants should keep a daily journal–what they did that day, what caused more pain than normal, and how they treated it.  This could show, for example, that the claimant had taken narcotic medication before performing those difficult activities.
  2. Attorneys should request all surveillance footage and video–many times, what is presented to the judge or jury is given out of context.  It doesn’t show the pain the claimant is in even a few minutes later.  My favorite was one where the defense attorney showed pictures of my client gardening–something he clearly said he couldn’t do anymore.  The defense attorney failed to present the video, which showed that my client wasn’t gardening, but standing still holding the rake while his wife did the gardening.
  3. Claimants should be mindful in their daily activities that they may be watched at any time.
Many people worry about this type of surveillance, but if there is surveillance, and it is properly disclosed, we find that it tends to help the claimants case, or at the very least, it is without effect.

« Previous Entries

Powered by WordPress | Designed by Elegant Themes